Editor’s note – (“Updated July 2025 to correct specs and remove inaccurate claims.”
Discover the Flashforge AD5X: a high-speed CoreXY 3D printer with multicolor and TPU‑flexible filament support. See real-world specs, performance, and value
The Flashforge AD5X marks a next-generation leap in the Adventurer series. With a CoreXY motion system, automatic bed leveling, and a new IFS (Intelligent Filament System) for multicolor printing, it aims to deliver both speed and ease of use, without breaking the bank. This review cuts through marketing hype to focus on real specs, real performance, and real user feedback.
True Specifications
- Build Volume: 220 × 220 × 220 mm (Reddit, 3DPrint)
- Motion System: CoreXY (up to 600 mm/s travel, 300 mm/s print) (3DPrint)
- Nozzle/Bed Temps: 300 °C hotend, 110 °C heated bed (3DPrint)
- Filament Diameter: 1.75 mm
- Nozzle Options: 0.4 mm default (0.25/0.6/0.8 mm optional) (3D Universe)
- Frame: Open metal structure, dual/tri Z-axis with automatic leveling pressure sensor (Flashforge)
- Display & Controls: 4.3″ touchscreen + USB/SD/Wi‑Fi (dual-band) connectivity
- Hardware: Dual‑core Cortex‑A53, 8 GB storage, silent stepper drivers (Flashforge)
- Weight: ≈11 kg net / 14.2 kg gross (3D Universe)
IFS Multicolor System & Materials
The AD5X includes a 4‑spool side‑mount IFS module that enables automated filament switching—supporting multicolor PLA and TPU‑95A flexibles, but NOT rigid multi‑filament blending. (Flashforge)
High‑speed multicolor TPU prints (e.g., “Snowplow” or Pipe Cox designs) have shown reliable, clean transitions with minimal bleeding—though some filament purge waste is inevitable. (3DWithUs)
Print Performance
- Speed: Achieves advertised travel speeds up to 600 mm/s and print speeds around 300 mm/s, with typical effective speeds closer to 200–300 mm/s. (3DPrint)
- Quality: Accurate to within ±0.1 mm, producing sharp, detailed prints in PLA, PETG, and flexible TPU. (3DPrint)
- Noise Level: Approximately 72–80 dB—clear and louder than enclosed printers.
- Reliability: Over 200 hours of consistent operation reported, with easy part access and robust structure. (3DPrint)
Software & Usability
- Bed Leveling: Fully automatic via pressure sensor—no manual screw adjustments required. (Flashforge)
- Slicer Compatibility: Supports FlashPrint, Orca-Flashforge, Cura, and PrusaSlicer. (3D Universe)
- Connectivity & Control: Touchscreen, USB, SD card, Ethernet, and dual-band Wi‑Fi; optional remote monitoring and time-lapse support.
6. Pros & Cons
✅ Pros
- CoreXY design + Core hardware = fast, stable prints
- Automated multicolor TPU support via 4-spool IFS
- Accurate prints for PLA/PETG/TPU flexibles
- Easy-to-use touchscreen and auto-leveling
⚠️ Cons
- Open frame—not ideal for high-temp ABS/ASA
- Significant filament purge waste during multicolor projects (Reddit, 3DPrint, FLASHFORGE, 3D Universe)
- Louder than enclosed printers (72–80 dB) (3DPrint)
- No rigid multicolor mixing; only single-nozzle color swapping
Final Verdict & Value
The Flashforge AD5X delivers solid, high-speed CoreXY performance with the convenience of automated multicolor filament printing—especially flexible TPU—right out of the box. With real-world specs and reliable results, it presents strong value at around $400–$450. Users should be aware of purge waste and open-frame design limits, but for hobbyists and creative users looking for fast, colorful prints, the AD5X delivers in spades.
Pricing & Availability,
- Typical price range: $400–$450 (single-package only) (3DWithUs)
- Ships: from official Flashforge and select resellers
- Avoid listings falsely advertising multiple pricing tiers—none exist.
Conclusion,
The Flashforge AD5X offers a rare combination: speed, accuracy, flexible TPU support, and real multicolor capability. It’s not built for hardened ABS or rigid color mixing, but for fast, reliable, and colorful prints under $500—it’s one of the better options on the table.
What is the purpose of this website and its horrible Ai generated garbage slop? This entire article is nonsense and doesn’t belong on the internet. Hopefully anyone coming here is able to recognize that this is all trash. Nothing here is accurate. Every part, including the images, is Ai generated and is either inaccurate, misleading, or just doesn’t make sense at all.
Hi there, I appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment. Just to clarify: the article is based on verified specs from Flashforge and reputable reviews. I’ve also corrected a typo on the build volume to ensure the post stays accurate.
As for the claim that it’s “AI-generated slop,” I use AI to support research and brainstorming, but every word is edited, fact-checked, and written by me. I care about clarity and usefulness, especially for fellow hobbyists exploring multicolor 3D printing.
If you spotted anything specific that seems misleading or confusing, I genuinely welcome constructive feedback—my goal is to help, not mislead. Otherwise, I hope future readers judge the post on its content and usefulness, not assumptions.
I, too, hope readers judge this article on its content, because it’s useless.
The information is verifiably incorrect in several places, including your very comment.
You claim that the information is “based on” verified specs from FlashForge, but that statement means little since you can base anything on anything else. Barely any of the information present here is fact.
Every single image is Ai generated and does not accurately portray any 3D printer that FlashForge currently has for sale, which is a very strange thing to include when you claim you’ve been running this machine for months. Why not take your own photos of the actual machine? Likely because you don’t really have one and you couldn’t be bothered to find one online, instead allowing the Ai to do its thing and generate the entire article.
You said you corrected a typo about the build volume, but further down it says it’s larger than other printers. Which ones? Because it has a very standard volume.
The machine is not capable of 6-color printing. This page seems to be the only source for that information I’ve found. The Ai tends to just make things up sometimes.
The article is supposed to be about the AD5X, yet part of the way down the name is then changed to AD5M, which is a different model not capable of multicolor printing; evidence the Ai got confused when generating the article.
Take for instance your section on the different packages offered. FlashForge offers no such tiered packages and your base price is nearly 4x the actual cost of this machine and FlashForge does not offer priority customer service; something you would know if either of the links to their support page actually took a visitor there.
You said every word is edited and fact checked, but with the number of incorrect statements and made up information, you’re either lying or completely incompetent. I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say you’re lying and simply using WordPress’ Ai tool to generate these pages so you have content for your affiliate links to seem more reputable. I commend the idea, but your effort is lacking.
Hi Kevin,
Thank you for your detailed and honest comment. I really appreciate your feedback, especially when it encourages me to improve.
You are correct that accuracy and transparency are crucial, especially in technical reviews. Here are the steps I will take right away:
1. I will check all product specifications directly from FlashForge to make sure everything is accurate.
2. I will clarify and correct any mistakes, like the build volume comparison, package tiers, and model name (AD5X vs. AD5M).
3. I will replace any AI-generated images with actual photos of the printer I have, or clearly label any visuals as conceptual if that’s necessary.
4. I will improve my editorial standards to avoid confusion or errors that could mislead readers.
I want to confirm that I am testing the AD5X in a real-world setting. I will share personal photos and updated notes soon.
My goal is to provide helpful and honest content for makers and hobbyists like you. Thanks again for keeping me accountable. If you’re open to it, I’d appreciate more feedback to make the platform better for everyone.
Best,
Kevin Meyer
3D Printing by Kevin